![Performance issue using new paging stynax in SQL Server 2012 (OFFSET n ROWS FETCH NEXT m ROWS ONLY) - Stack Overflow Performance issue using new paging stynax in SQL Server 2012 (OFFSET n ROWS FETCH NEXT m ROWS ONLY) - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/aECvD.png)
Performance issue using new paging stynax in SQL Server 2012 (OFFSET n ROWS FETCH NEXT m ROWS ONLY) - Stack Overflow
![sql server - Why are there execution plan differences between OFFSET ... FETCH and the old-style ROW_NUMBER scheme? - Database Administrators Stack Exchange sql server - Why are there execution plan differences between OFFSET ... FETCH and the old-style ROW_NUMBER scheme? - Database Administrators Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/0To4H.png)
sql server - Why are there execution plan differences between OFFSET ... FETCH and the old-style ROW_NUMBER scheme? - Database Administrators Stack Exchange
![Sql server 2012 fetch vs old row_number performance. What am I missing? Why is row_number 17x faster? - Stack Overflow Sql server 2012 fetch vs old row_number performance. What am I missing? Why is row_number 17x faster? - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/ahpUB.jpg)